Hollow Spindles archive

Thursday 12 March 2009

Mark Baker and John Lovatt look at how different parts can affect performance

Error loading Partial View script (file: ~/Views/MacroPartials/cwsGalleryImages.cshtml)

Hollow, or through-bored spindles, have a number of advantages:

1 Easier ejection of Morse-taper tools using a rod or knock out bar. With non-hollow spindles, the safest method of ejection is by an ejector which fits the spindle thread.

2 Morse tapers are easier to keep clear of debris, because they can be blown or brushed through. This reduces the likelihood of debris interfering with the correct seating of the tool in the Morse taper, and the possibility of the tool slipping. The latter could score, damage, or destroy the mating surface of the Morse-taper bore. Once damaged, the Morse taper's efficiency is compromised, and damage may also be caused to other Morse tapers put into the spindle. The spindle loses its ability to hold tools securely, and may need replacing, an expensive job at best.

3 Economy and speed in feeding long lengths of wood through to a hollow work-holding device. This is especially relevant in production work, where only the end of the timber would be wasted, against the sacrificial holding point needed on individual pieces. Through-bored or hollow spindles allow some work to be reversed in the chuck without tailstock support, allowing the end to be detailed.

4 Adding a draw bar improves the security of Morse-taper-based tooling. This is particularly important where the tool's cutting action pulls directly at the taper, such as when turning with a chisel away from the headstock or, in the case of a drill or boring tool which tends to bind, when withdrawing after cutting. This method of holding requires the Morse-taper tool to be made with a threaded end section to take the draw-bar. A draw-bar can also help counteract the effects of a damaged or worn Morse-taper bore.

Double-ended spindles

Some lathes let you turn at both ends of the headstock. They are usually of a fixed headstock design. To differentiate between the two ends they are referred to as Inboard, or over-bed, and Outboard (as seen from the turners view).

Because lathes usually have a main direction of rotation, the thread on the outboard end will be left-handed (opposite handed to the inboard side), or outboard extras would tend to unscrew, with bad results.

Both fittings can be engineered to have the same thread size. For example, both threads could be 1 1/2in x 6tpi, allowing dual-threaded accessories - those with a left and right-handed thread machined into them. There is a practical limit of about 25mm (1in), providing the thread is of a fairly coarse pitch.

But most machines don't have this facility, usually having different fitting sizes on each side. This need to duplicate accessories, particularly chucks, makes this type of design more expensive. There are advantages as well as disadvantages with this type of lathe.


- Better ergonomics when bowl turning. This means the turner can see and stand in a better position when working on the outboard end of the lathe, as there is no lathe bed to hinder access. The turning capacity is greatly increased without having to massively increase the swing over the bed for inboard turning

- Increased rigidity, as the bed and headstock are made in one piece or are rigidly bolted together


- The location of the drive pulley, means this type of design usually makes speed changing and belt replacement more difficult. We'll cover this in more detail when we look at the drive chain

- The need to duplicate accessories

- The outboard facility needs a lot more workshop floor area to get to it correctly

David Preece

Tagged In:

Mark Baker , Lathe , John Lovatt , Woodturners Guide , Spindle

Glossary Rollover a term to view its definition

Lathe , Headstock , Tailstock

"Morse tapers are easier to keep clear of debris"